← Benefits

Benefits · Adequacy, take-up and hardship · Great Britain

Adequacy, take-up and hardship: who misses out?

Up to 900,000 pensioner families entitled to Pension Credit did not claim it in 2024–25 — up to £2.4bn unclaimed. New 2024–25 estimates also cover Universal Credit or equivalent benefits; those working-age estimates are still in development.

Evidence last reviewed 3 October 2026

Unclaimed support

Survey-based evidence
Family Resources Survey linked to administrative recordsFieldwork: Financial years ending 2013–2025; actual coverage variesEntitlement is modelled. Estimates have sampling ranges, method breaks and a missing year during the pandemic. Working-age estimates are Official Statistics in Development.

Do people claim the support they are entitled to?

About 6 in 10 people entitled to Pension Credit claim it

Estimated take-up of income-related benefits among entitled pensioners, by caseload (people) and expenditure (money), Great Britain, 2024–25.

Great Britain · 2024–25 (financial year ending 2025)
  • Pension Credit — peopleshare of entitled people who claimed62%
  • Pension Credit — moneyshare of the available amount claimed74%
  • Housing Benefit (pensioners) — people83%
  • Housing Benefit (pensioners) — money86%
Take-up by money is higher than by people because those with larger entitlements are more likely to claim. Up to 900,000 pensioner families missed out on Pension Credit, about £2,500 a year each on average. The caseload take-up estimate was unchanged from the previous year; expenditure take-up rose from 71% to 74%. Missing out on Pension Credit can also mean missing help that it unlocks.

Great Britain · 2024–25 (financial year ending 2025) · Survey-based

Show the workings — About 6 in 10 people entitled to Pension Credit claim it
Geography:
Great Britain — Pensioner benefit units entitled to each benefit
Measure:
Per cent take-up
Period:
2024–25 (financial year ending 2025)
Status:
Survey-based
Calculation:
As published (central estimates).
Compare with:
2023–24: Pension Credit 62% (people), 71% (money)
Not included / breaks:
These bars cover pension-age benefits only. The 2025 release also publishes separate working-age estimates. Survey-based, so entitlement is modelled from reported income and savings.

Source: DWP, Income-related benefits: estimates of take-up, financial year ending 2025, PC1, PC2 and UC1 (released 22 October 2026).

View the data as a table
Measure2024–25
Pension Credit — people62%
Pension Credit — money74%
Housing Benefit (pensioners) — people83%
Housing Benefit (pensioners) — money86%
Pension Credit: families entitled but not claiming (up to)900,000
Pension Credit: unclaimed (up to)£2.4bn
Housing Benefit (pensioners): unclaimed (up to)£1.3bn

DWP’s October 2026 release also estimates take-up of Universal Credit or equivalent benefits in 2024–25. Around 2.42 million eligible families did not claim, within a range of 2.26–2.59 million. These new survey-based estimates are Official Statistics in Development. Changes in the eligible group mean the 2023–24 and 2024–25 estimates are not directly comparable.

A separate DWP measure, “unfulfilled eligibility”, estimates that people already claiming could have received 1.2% more of benefit spending (£3.7bn) in 2025–26 if they had reported all their circumstances — most of it in DLA, PIP and Universal Credit. That is different from take-up (people not claiming at all) and from underpayments caused by DWP’s own mistakes.

How certain are the take-up estimates?

DWP combines administrative records with the Family Resources Survey and a model of entitlement. A point estimate is not an exact count. In 2024–25, the published range for eligible pensioner families missing Pension Credit was 730,000–900,000.

Comparisons need care around the 2017 method refinements, pandemic interview changes and improved administrative linking introduced in 2023–24. The model does not establish why people do not claim, and sample sizes do not support local take-up rates. DWP findings and methodology.

The benefit cap: a limit on adequacy, and the key to viral totals

Weekly benefit cap, working-age households
HouseholdOutside Greater LondonGreater London
Couple, or single parent with children living with them£423.46£486.98
Single adult£283.71£326.29

The cap limits the total some working-age households receive, whatever their rent or number of children. It does not apply over State Pension age; to households earning £881 a month or more combined after tax; to people on Universal Credit with limited capability for work and work-related activity or caring for a disabled person; or where anyone in the household receives PIP, DLA, Attendance Allowance, Carer’s Allowance, the ESA support component, Industrial Injuries benefits, Adult Disability Payment or a war pension.

That is why almost every viral “family gets £X a week” story describes a total above the cap: it is only possible if the household is exempt, and the usual reason for exemption is disability or caring. The figure can be accurate and the “paid to sit at home” framing still wrong.

Hardship: what is and is not measured

There is no official count of food bank use. The Trussell network — a charity, and only part of all UK food banks — gave out more than 2.6 million emergency food parcels in calendar year 2025, 12% fewer than in 2024; Trussell links the fall to easing inflation. It is a lower bound, not a measure of all need, and parcel counts are not people.

Official measures of hardship — relative and absolute poverty after housing costs, and material deprivation — come from the Households Below Average Income statistics and are shown on the Inequality page. They are the right test of whether a benefit change helps: a falling caseload is not success if eligible people lose support. The options for take-up and adequacy are compared in What would move the needle?

Sources and methods (4)

Method notes

  • Take-up estimates come from the Family Resources Survey linked to DWP records for 2024–25 (financial year ending 2025); they carry ranges, and “up to” figures are upper estimates.
  • Unfulfilled eligibility, take-up and official-error underpayments are three different measures and must not be added together.
  • Trussell figures are charity administrative data, not official statistics.