Local profile · Portsmouth (unitary city council) · 2022–2026

4.5% of Portsmouth’s working-age residents claim work-related benefits, the highest share in Hampshire

In August 2026, 4.5% of residents aged 16–64 in Portsmouth were on the claimant count, 0.5 percentage points above England’s 4.0%. Figures are for Portsmouth council area; compare them with the other 12 areas below.

Evidence last reviewed 11 October 2026

The evidence

How does Portsmouth compare?

Portsmouth: claimant rate 4.5%, the highest of 13 areas; Hart is lowest at 1.8%

People claiming Universal Credit or Jobseeker’s Allowance who are required to look for work, as a percentage of residents aged 16–64, August 2026. Not the unemployment rate.

Ceremonial Hampshire’s 13 council areas (11 districts, Portsmouth and Southampton) · August 2026
August 2026England 4.0%
  • Portsmouth4.5%
  • Southampton4.2%
  • Gosport3.6%
  • Havant3.3%
  • Rushmoor3.0%
  • Basingstoke and Deane2.7%
  • Eastleigh2.3%
  • New Forest2.3%
  • Winchester2.1%
  • East Hampshire2.1%
  • Fareham2.0%
  • Test Valley2.0%
  • Hart1.8%
Portsmouth has the highest claimant rate (4.5%) and Hart the lowest (1.8%); 2 of 13 areas are above England’s 4.0%. Portsmouth is 4.5%, 0.5 percentage points above England (1st highest of 13). An administrative count, not unemployment: some claimants are in low-paid work and asked to look for more, and many unemployed people claim nothing. Not seasonally adjusted; the latest month is provisional.

Ceremonial Hampshire’s 13 council areas (11 districts, Portsmouth and Southampton) · August 2026 · Published statistics

Show the workings — Portsmouth: claimant rate 4.5%, the highest of 13 areas; Hart is lowest at 1.8%
Geography:
Ceremonial Hampshire’s 13 council areas (11 districts, Portsmouth and Southampton)
Measure:
% of residents aged 16–64
Period:
August 2026
Status:
Published statistics
Calculation:
As published by the source.
Compare with:
England 4.0%, August 2026

Source: ONS Claimant Count via Nomis (NM_162_1, measure 2), Claimants as a proportion of residents aged 16–64.

View the data as a table
Area% of residents aged 16–64Period
Portsmouth4.5%August 2026
Southampton4.2%August 2026
Gosport3.6%August 2026
Havant3.3%August 2026
Rushmoor3.0%August 2026
Basingstoke and Deane2.7%August 2026
Eastleigh2.3%August 2026
New Forest2.3%August 2026
Winchester2.1%August 2026
East Hampshire2.1%August 2026
Fareham2.0%August 2026
Test Valley2.0%August 2026
Hart1.8%August 2026

Compare Portsmouth with any other area on another measure: compare Hampshire’s 13 areas.

Local house prices over 30 years

These are median prices paid for homes sold in Portsmouth, in the money of each year. They describe transactions, not the value of every home. Changes in the mix of properties sold can change the median.

Annual data: Portsmouth: median price paid, year ending December

Thirty December observations, 1996–2025, within the fixed 1996–2026 window. December 2026 is not yet available. The latest March 2026 rolling-year observation used elsewhere on the page is not substituted for a December observation. A dash means no comparable observation is supplied; it is not zero. Registered residential property transactions in this council area; not an inflation-adjusted or quality-adjusted house-price index.

1996–2026; £ thousands, nominal. No change is calculated across definition or assessment breaks.

Portsmouth: median price paid, year ending December; £ thousands, nominal
YearMedian price (£ thousands)
199648.3
199753
199857.1
199960
200073
200182
2002104
2003122
2004135
2005138
2006145
2007156
2008151.5
2009145
2010150
2011149
2012150
2013154
2014163.5
2015174
2016190
2017204.3
2018213.3
2019210
2020222.6
2021237.5
2022259
2023253
2024255
2025259
2026No comparable observations supplied

ONS original workbook, table 2a: median prices for administrative geographies

Is Portsmouth getting better?

Mixed — and the measures moving fastest in the wrong direction get the least attention. Every tile links to the evidence behind it: what is driving the number, what has been tried, what worked, and what it would cost to do something different.

6 worsening8 improving9 no direction

Housing

Education

Worsening
3.55%

Pupils missing half or more of school, vs Southampton and England

Severe school absence is still rising

England 2.39%

1.69% in 2018/19 — more than doubled

Measure
Pupils missing 50%+ of sessions
Area
Portsmouth state-funded schools
Period
2024/25 · Department for Education
Absence trends, causes and the EBSA evidence gap
Improving
42.9%

EHC plans issued inside the 20-week legal deadline

EHC plan timeliness has recovered sharply

England 45.5% — now almost level

Fell to 1.6% in 2023 from 97% in 2021

Measure
New EHC plans issued within 20 weeks
Area
Portsmouth local authority
Period
Calendar 2025 · Department for Education
The 2023 collapse, the recovery, and what is unexplained
Worsening
35.2%

Pupils passing English and maths GCSE at grade 5+, vs Southampton and England

Barely a third of pupils get a strong pass in English and maths

England reached 45.4% and Southampton 38.9%, so Portsmouth trails its closest comparable city by 3.7 percentage points.

The rate was 34.4% in 2023/24 and 31.6% in 2022/23, so it is recovering slowly from a sharp fall.

Measure
Pupils achieving grade 5 or above in both English and maths GCSE
Area
Portsmouth state-funded schools
Period
2024/25 · DfE
Full GCSE series, cohort sizes and the Southampton gap
Rising
7.17%

Share of Portsmouth pupils holding an EHC plan, vs Southampton and England

One pupil in fourteen now has an EHC plan

Southampton is at 6.72% and England at 6.04%. Portsmouth sat below Southampton for six years and overtook it this year.

The rate was 3.64% in 2018/19, so it has almost doubled in seven years.

Measure
Pupils on a school roll holding an Education, Health and Care plan
Area
Portsmouth schools, all types
Period
January 2026 school census · DfE
What a rising EHCP rate does and does not tell you

Skills

Environment

Transport

Council

How these were chosen, and what is missing

These are indicators that are genuinely measured, comparable over time, and have an honest direction of travel. Population is deliberately excluded — a rising or falling population is not "better" or "worse". Where a measure has no meaningful good/bad direction, none is shown. Temporary accommodation and fuel poverty are available in the additional official evidence register, with their own dates and definitions. Food insecurity and the causes of changing homelessness remain evidence gaps; these should not be inferred from housing-delivery figures alone.

Portsmouth: how things have changed

House prices over 30 years, plus the available history for rents and population. Each chart covers the same local-authority area throughout.

What homes sold for

£260,000

Median sale price · year ending Mar 2026 · Portsmouth

£0£150k£300kMar 1996Mar 2026

£213,000 more than in Mar 1996 (453.2% increase). Cash prices; inflation accounts for part of the rise.

Source, explanation and data table

Median price paid for homes sold in each year ending March, 1996–2026. Cash prices, not adjusted for inflation. This differs from the mix-adjusted House Price Index average.

Official source and download ↗ · checked 2026-10-16

What homes sold for · Portsmouth
PeriodPounds
Mar 1996£47,000
Mar 1997£49,200
Mar 1998£54,000
Mar 1999£58,000
Mar 2000£64,000
Mar 2001£75,000
Mar 2002£84,995
Mar 2003£110,000
Mar 2004£124,000
Mar 2005£137,950
Mar 2006£138,500
Mar 2007£148,000
Mar 2008£158,000
Mar 2009£147,250
Mar 2010£148,000
Mar 2011£150,000
Mar 2012£149,995
Mar 2013£150,000
Mar 2014£155,000
Mar 2015£166,000
Mar 2016£177,000
Mar 2017£192,625
Mar 2018£207,000
Mar 2019£212,500
Mar 2020£212,500
Mar 2021£230,000
Mar 2022£240,000
Mar 2023£260,000
Mar 2024£251,000
Mar 2025£258,000
Mar 2026£260,000

What renting costs each month

£1,368

Aug 2026 · Portsmouth

£0£750£1,500Jan 2015Aug 2026

£533 more per month than in Jan 2015 (63.8% increase). Cash prices; inflation accounts for part of the rise.

Source, explanation and data table

Average monthly private rent, January 2015–August 2026. New and existing tenancies. Cash prices, not adjusted for inflation; no comparable 30-year local series is available here.

Official source and download ↗ · checked 2026-10-16

What renting costs each month · Portsmouth
PeriodPounds
Jan 2015£835
Feb 2015£836
Mar 2015£836
Apr 2015£837
May 2015£838
Jun 2015£840
Jul 2015£841
Aug 2015£843
Sept 2015£845
Oct 2015£849
Nov 2015£854
Dec 2015£858
Jan 2016£861
Feb 2016£864
Mar 2016£867
Apr 2016£871
May 2016£875
Jun 2016£879
Jul 2016£881
Aug 2016£885
Sept 2016£889
Oct 2016£894
Nov 2016£898
Dec 2016£903
Jan 2017£907
Feb 2017£909
Mar 2017£912
Apr 2017£917
May 2017£923
Jun 2017£926
Jul 2017£928
Aug 2017£931
Sept 2017£933
Oct 2017£934
Nov 2017£935
Dec 2017£938
Jan 2018£939
Feb 2018£940
Mar 2018£939
Apr 2018£940
May 2018£942
Jun 2018£942
Jul 2018£941
Aug 2018£939
Sept 2018£937
Oct 2018£937
Nov 2018£938
Dec 2018£940
Jan 2019£945
Feb 2019£949
Mar 2019£952
Apr 2019£952
May 2019£953
Jun 2019£954
Jul 2019£954
Aug 2019£954
Sept 2019£956
Oct 2019£961
Nov 2019£967
Dec 2019£970
Jan 2020£971
Feb 2020£972
Mar 2020£971
Apr 2020£971
May 2020£970
Jun 2020£969
Jul 2020£969
Aug 2020£970
Sept 2020£975
Oct 2020£976
Nov 2020£978
Dec 2020£979
Jan 2021£980
Feb 2021£981
Mar 2021£982
Apr 2021£984
May 2021£985
Jun 2021£985
Jul 2021£987
Aug 2021£991
Sept 2021£995
Oct 2021£1,000
Nov 2021£1,004
Dec 2021£1,011
Jan 2022£1,016
Feb 2022£1,020
Mar 2022£1,024
Apr 2022£1,027
May 2022£1,032
Jun 2022£1,035
Jul 2022£1,038
Aug 2022£1,041
Sept 2022£1,047
Oct 2022£1,054
Nov 2022£1,059
Dec 2022£1,067
Jan 2023£1,079
Feb 2023£1,096
Mar 2023£1,111
Apr 2023£1,124
May 2023£1,132
Jun 2023£1,147
Jul 2023£1,160
Aug 2023£1,173
Sept 2023£1,180
Oct 2023£1,193
Nov 2023£1,209
Dec 2023£1,228
Jan 2024£1,239
Feb 2024£1,248
Mar 2024£1,255
Apr 2024£1,262
May 2024£1,268
Jun 2024£1,275
Jul 2024£1,281
Aug 2024£1,289
Sept 2024£1,292
Oct 2024£1,298
Nov 2024£1,305
Dec 2024£1,311
Jan 2025£1,315
Feb 2025£1,317
Mar 2025£1,321
Apr 2025£1,326
May 2025£1,331
Jun 2025£1,338
Jul 2025£1,339
Aug 2025£1,337
Sept 2025£1,335
Oct 2025£1,336
Nov 2025£1,339
Dec 2025£1,341
Jan 2026£1,345
Feb 2026£1,349
Mar 2026£1,357
Apr 2026£1,362
May 2026£1,366
Jun 2026£1,367
Jul 2026£1,367
Aug 2026£1,368

How the population has changed

211,475

Population estimate · mid-2025 · Portsmouth

0125k250k20012025

23,432 more people than in 2001 (12.5% increase).

Source, explanation and data table

Mid-year population estimates, 2001–2025, from the current Nomis series. A district or unitary authority, not a city ward count. Earlier requested years are unavailable and have not been filled.

Official source and download ↗ · checked 2026-10-16

How the population has changed · Portsmouth
PeriodPeople
2001188,043
2002188,476
2003190,283
2004193,483
2005196,318
2006195,964
2007194,907
2008196,036
2009198,983
2010202,700
2011205,433
2012205,729
2013205,905
2014206,200
2015207,873
2016209,951
2017210,965
2018211,215
2019210,412
2020209,142
2021207,119
2022209,614
2023213,939
2024212,936
2025211,475

How life feels in Portsmouth

Do people feel they belong? Can they have a say? These survey answers add residents’ experiences to the facts about homes and services.

Survey estimates Portsmouth · people aged 16 and over · 2025/26 release.

● Local estimate   ■ England estimate. Lines show the range of uncertainty, not changes over time. Small differences alone do not establish a meaningful gap.

Community and belonging

Often or always lonely

7.0%

October 2025–March 2026

0%50%100%

England: 6.7%

How this was measured

Community and Engagement Survey · People aged 16 and over · October 2025–March 2026.

Question: How often do you feel lonely?
Answer counted: Often/Always

95% confidence interval: 4.7%–10.2%. Sample: 527 people answering this question. This is a sample count, not a count of residents with this experience.

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Original table C3, cell D196 ↗ · Publication and methods ↗

Source release: 2026-07-31. Checked 2026-10-16. Agent source and calculation checks; independent review outstanding.

Feel they belong in their neighbourhood

57.6%

October 2025–March 2026

0%50%100%

England: 61.2%

How this was measured

Community and Engagement Survey · People aged 16 and over · October 2025–March 2026.

Question: How strongly do you feel you belong to your immediate neighbourhood?
Answer counted: GROUPED: Very/Fairly strongly

95% confidence interval: 52.0%–62.9%. Sample: 474 people answering this question. This is a sample count, not a count of residents with this experience.

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Original table D3, cell D196 ↗ · Publication and methods ↗

Source release: 2026-07-31. Checked 2026-10-16. Agent source and calculation checks; independent review outstanding.

Proud to live in their area

51.5%

October 2025–March 2026

0%50%100%

England: 61.6%

How this was measured

Community and Engagement Survey · People aged 16 and over · October 2025–March 2026.

Question: How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements? - I am proud to live in my local area
Answer counted: GROUPED: Agree

95% confidence interval: 45.5%–57.5%. Sample: 493 people answering this question. This is a sample count, not a count of residents with this experience.

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Original table E3, cell D196 ↗ · Publication and methods ↗

Source release: 2026-07-31. Checked 2026-10-16. Agent source and calculation checks; independent review outstanding.

Having a say

Feel able to influence local decisions

24.9%

October 2025–March 2026

0%50%100%

England: 26.4%

How this was measured

Community and Engagement Survey · People aged 16 and over · October 2025–March 2026.

Question: To what extent do you agree or disagree that you personally can influence decisions affecting your local area?
Answer counted: GROUPED: Agree

95% confidence interval: 20.6%–29.8%. Sample: 503 people answering this question. This is a sample count, not a count of residents with this experience.

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Original table B3, cell D196 ↗ · Publication and methods ↗

Source release: 2026-07-31. Checked 2026-10-16. Agent source and calculation checks; independent review outstanding.

Volunteer through a group at least monthly

18.1%

October 2025–March 2026

0%50%100%

England: 18.2%

How this was measured

Community and Engagement Survey · People aged 16 and over · October 2025–March 2026.

Question: Formal volunteering at least once a month in the last 12 months
Answer counted: Total (yes)

95% confidence interval: 14.1%–23.0%. Sample: 503 people answering this question. This is a sample count, not a count of residents with this experience.

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Original table G3, cell D196 ↗ · Publication and methods ↗

Source release: 2026-07-31. Checked 2026-10-16. Agent source and calculation checks; independent review outstanding.

Culture and libraries

Attend or take part in arts in person

89.0%

April 2025–March 2026 · experiences in the previous 12 months

0%50%100%

England: 83.4%

How this was measured

Community and Engagement Survey · People aged 16 and over · April 2025–March 2026. Answers refer to the previous 12 months.

Question: Engaged with the arts in person in the last 12 months
Answer counted: Total

95% confidence interval: 85.4%–91.8%. Sample: 549 people answering this question. This is a sample count, not a count of residents with this experience.

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Original table I3, cell D196 ↗ · Publication and methods ↗

Source release: 2026-07-31. Checked 2026-10-16. Agent source and calculation checks; independent review outstanding.

More about community life in Portsmouth →

Compare all three areas and England → · Download figures and uncertainty (CSV) · Shared evidence file

Issues in Portsmouth

Crime recorded in Portsmouth

Police-recorded crime, street-level data from police.uk, September 2025 to August 2026

23,794 crimes were recorded by the police in the Portsmouth council area from September 2025 to August 2026: 112.5 per 1,000 residents, the 2nd highest of Hampshire’s 13 areas. A further 2,995 anti-social behaviour incidents are counted separately.

Rates are per resident. Places that draw large numbers of shoppers, commuters, students, visitors and night-time crowds — Portsmouth and Southampton city centres above all — record crimes against people who do not live there, so their rates overstate the risk to residents. Recorded crime also reflects how often crimes are reported and how forces record them, not only how much crime happens.

England’s official rate was 83.4 per 1,000 (ONS police recorded crime excluding fraud, year ending March 2026) — a different source and year, so read the gap (+29.1) as approximate.

What kinds of crime are recorded in Portsmouth?

Violence and sexual offences make up 44% of recorded crime in Portsmouth

Crimes by police.uk category, September 2025 to August 2026. Anti-social behaviour (2,995 incidents) is not a crime and is not included.

Portsmouth council area · September 2025 to August 2026
  • Violence and sexual offences10,440 (44%)
  • Shoplifting3,072 (13%)
  • Public order2,218 (9%)
  • Criminal damage and arson1,636 (7%)
  • Other theft1,578 (7%)
  • Vehicle crime1,382 (6%)
  • Drugs1,057 (4%)
  • Burglary597 (3%)
  • Bicycle theft431 (2%)
  • Other crime418 (2%)
  • Robbery399 (2%)
  • Possession of weapons384 (2%)
  • Theft from the person182 (under 1%)
Police-recorded crime, street-level data from police.uk, September 2025 to August 2026. Categories are police.uk’s own groupings and are broad: “violence and sexual offences” runs from harassment to serious assault. Recorded crime depends on reporting and recording as well as offending. For the year to March 2026, ONS counted 24,163 crimes in Portsmouth (excluding fraud); police.uk shows 23,346 for the same months (−3.4%).

Portsmouth council area · September 2025 to August 2026 · Police management information (police.uk); not National Statistics

Show the workings — Violence and sexual offences make up 44% of recorded crime in Portsmouth
Geography:
Portsmouth council area
Measure:
crimes (count) and share of all crimes
Period:
September 2025 to August 2026
Status:
Police management information (police.uk); not National Statistics
Calculation:
police.uk street-level records counted by category and assigned to the council area by map point; anti-social behaviour and British Transport Police records excluded.
Not included / breaks:
Fraud (not on police.uk); crimes with no usable location; anti-social behaviour (shown separately).

Source: police.uk open data, street-level crimes (Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary), POST https://data.police.uk/api/crimes-street/all-crime, months 2025-09 to 2026-08, by council-area polygon; retrieved 3 October 2026.

View the data as a table
CategoryCrimesShare
Violence and sexual offences10,44043.9%
Shoplifting3,07212.9%
Public order2,2189.3%
Criminal damage and arson1,6366.9%
Other theft1,5786.6%
Vehicle crime1,3825.8%
Drugs1,0574.4%
Burglary5972.5%
Bicycle theft4311.8%
Other crime4181.8%
Robbery3991.7%
Possession of weapons3841.6%
Theft from the person1820.8%
All crimes (excluding anti-social behaviour)23,794100%
Anti-social behaviour (not a crime)2,995—

How does recorded crime in Portsmouth move month by month?

1,983 crimes a month on average in Portsmouth; the busiest month was July 2026

Police-recorded crimes per month, excluding anti-social behaviour, September 2025 to August 2026.

Portsmouth council area · September 2025 to August 2026
Crimes per month01,0002,000Sep ’25Dec ’25Mar ’26Jun ’26Aug ’262,183
The busiest month was July 2026 (2,300) and the quietest February 2026 (1,743). Recorded crime usually rises in summer and dips in winter, and one year is too short to call a trend. Police-recorded crime, street-level data from police.uk, September 2025 to August 2026.

Portsmouth council area · September 2025 to August 2026 · Police management information (police.uk); not National Statistics

Show the workings — 1,983 crimes a month on average in Portsmouth; the busiest month was July 2026
Geography:
Portsmouth council area
Measure:
crimes per month
Period:
September 2025 to August 2026
Status:
Police management information (police.uk); not National Statistics
Calculation:
Monthly counts of police.uk street-level crimes assigned to the council area by map point.
Not included / breaks:
Fraud; crimes with no usable location; anti-social behaviour (in the table only).

Source: police.uk open data, street-level crimes (Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary), POST https://data.police.uk/api/crimes-street/all-crime, months 2025-09 to 2026-08, by council-area polygon; retrieved 3 October 2026.

View the data as a table
MonthCrimes (excluding anti-social behaviour)Anti-social behaviour incidents
September 20251,965239
October 20251,942245
November 20251,870197
December 20251,786182
January 20261,822202
February 20261,743175
March 20261,999263
April 20261,897266
May 20262,208314
June 20262,079260
July 20262,300322
August 20262,183330

How this compares with the official statistics

For the year to March 2026, ONS counted 24,163 crimes in Portsmouth (excluding fraud); police.uk shows 23,346 for the same months (−3.4%). The official series comes from the ONS and is the one used for national figures; police.uk is used here because it gives all 13 areas the same months, with categories and monthly detail. Why the two differ

Current status

Who runs the council
Liberal Democrat majority (record checked 2026-08-01)
MPs (2024 general election)
Portsmouth North — Amanda Martin (Labour); Portsmouth South — Stephen Morgan (Labour). Constituency and council boundaries differ.
Local government reorganisation
Decision withdrawn; reorganisation under government review (checked 2026-09-23). Portsmouth council continues unchanged. What was decided and withdrawn

Party control and representatives across the county: Hampshire political map.

Who can change this?

Raise an issue with the body that holds the power. Responsibilities follow the two-tier split: the 11 districts share Hampshire County Council for schools, social care and public health, while Portsmouth and Southampton run all of these themselves.

Who holds the levers for Portsmouth
IssueLocal councilCounty / combined authorityNHS and policeCentral government
Housing supply and affordabilityPortsmouth City Council: local plan, planning decisions, homelessness duty, its own council housing where heldHighways, schools and other infrastructure that sites need—MHCLG: national planning policy and housing targets; Homes England: affordable-housing funding
Work and benefitsPortsmouth City Council: local economic development and employment supportHampshire and the Solent Combined County Authority: adult skills (from August 2027) and strategic growthNHS: health-related support to stay in workDWP and Jobcentre Plus: Universal Credit and conditionality
School attendancePortsmouth City Council: the local authority for schoolsPortsmouth City Council (unitary: also the upper tier): attendance support under DfE’s statutory guidanceNHS: children’s mental health servicesDfE: funding and attendance policy; schools and academy trusts
Health and life expectancyPortsmouth City Council: housing standards, leisure, environmental healthPortsmouth City Council (unitary: also the upper tier): public health duty and grantNHS Hampshire and Isle of Wight ICB: commissioning; GP practices and trusts: careDHSC: NHS funding and public health grant
Crime and safetyPortsmouth City Council: Community Safety Partnership, licensing, CCTV—Police and Crime Commissioner: police plan and budget; Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary: operationsHome Office: police funding formula and law

Connections

  • Claimant rates across Hampshire over time

    The national jobs story, and the claimant count’s own definition and history. DWP and Jobcentre Plus set and run Universal Credit conditionality; councils and the combined county authority run employment and skills support.

  • Inequality in the UK

    Income, wealth and place, measured nationally. Many bodies: national tax and benefits, councils, the NHS and employers. No single local body controls it.

  • Compare Portsmouth with another area

    Put any two Hampshire areas side by side on the same measure and period.

  • Which bodies cover this area?

    ICB, police, education and social-care responsibilities for each of the 13 areas.

Everything in the Portsmouth section

I live in Portsmouth

Find your ward, your constituency and what the data says about your part of the city.

I want to understand an issue

Eight issues, each with the evidence, the scale, the trend and what is being done.

I need to contact or challenge someone

Find who actually holds the power over an issue — it is often not the council.

What residents told University of Portsmouth researchers

What kind of evidence this is

Qualitative community-based study — one-to-one conversations plus a single group event. 24 contributors in total (18 one-to-one, 6 at a group event), recruited through community organisations — self-selected, and the report makes no claim to be representative of Portsmouth. It contains no survey percentages, so nothing below is a population estimate: these are themes from what a small number of residents described.

Booking a GP appointment was itself described as the barrier, ahead of the appointment

Participants described barriers at the point of booking — being required to use an online form or to telephone at a fixed time — and reported that all booking routes were impractical for people who work, lack internet access or confidence, or lack the physical dexterity to use a phone.

18 one-to-one participants living in PO1–PO6 (3 men, 15 women, ages 38–76, 15 with a long-term condition or disability), plus one event with 6 attendees who work with residents of deprived areas. Self-selected, recruited through community organisations; not a representative sample of Portsmouth. · Qualitative community-based study: one-to-one conversations plus one group event, grouped by topic then thematically analysed. No survey instrument, no percentages, no population estimate. · p.6

Some participants had stopped seeking primary care altogether, and presented later in emergency settings

The report states that many people have given up trying to seek help and either hoped they got better or accessed emergency services once seriously unwell, and links this to pressure on Emergency Departments and Urgent Treatment Centres.

18 one-to-one participants living in PO1–PO6 (3 men, 15 women, ages 38–76, 15 with a long-term condition or disability), plus one event with 6 attendees who work with residents of deprived areas. Self-selected, recruited through community organisations; not a representative sample of Portsmouth. · Qualitative community-based study: one-to-one conversations plus one group event, grouped by topic then thematically analysed. No survey instrument, no percentages, no population estimate. · p.57

Digital-by-default access was the single barrier that recurred across every service area

The report's first key recommendation is that reliance on telephones and the internet acts as a barrier to healthcare, housing and education alike, and that alternatives must be made available rather than assumed away.

18 one-to-one participants living in PO1–PO6 (3 men, 15 women, ages 38–76, 15 with a long-term condition or disability), plus one event with 6 attendees who work with residents of deprived areas. Self-selected, recruited through community organisations; not a representative sample of Portsmouth. · Qualitative community-based study: one-to-one conversations plus one group event, grouped by topic then thematically analysed. No survey instrument, no percentages, no population estimate. · p.59

Where mental health support was obtained, participants described it being withdrawn rather than tapered

Mental health services were reported as not always accessible, with no clarity about who could refer someone, and support that was often withdrawn once gained.

18 one-to-one participants living in PO1–PO6 (3 men, 15 women, ages 38–76, 15 with a long-term condition or disability), plus one event with 6 attendees who work with residents of deprived areas. Self-selected, recruited through community organisations; not a representative sample of Portsmouth. · Qualitative community-based study: one-to-one conversations plus one group event, grouped by topic then thematically analysed. No survey instrument, no percentages, no population estimate. · p.57

NHS dental care was described as closed to some participants entirely — not merely delayed

Dental care was reported as not accessible for all, with some participants unable to join a patient list at all and others facing delays and cancellations.

18 one-to-one participants living in PO1–PO6 (3 men, 15 women, ages 38–76, 15 with a long-term condition or disability), plus one event with 6 attendees who work with residents of deprived areas. Self-selected, recruited through community organisations; not a representative sample of Portsmouth. · Qualitative community-based study: one-to-one conversations plus one group event, grouped by topic then thematically analysed. No survey instrument, no percentages, no population estimate. · p.58

Community groups and centres were the one part of the system participants consistently valued

Support groups, community centres, churches and similar spaces were valued and described as an alternative route to mental wellbeing, but were seen as under-funded and hard to sustain, and public transport limited who could reach them.

18 one-to-one participants living in PO1–PO6 (3 men, 15 women, ages 38–76, 15 with a long-term condition or disability), plus one event with 6 attendees who work with residents of deprived areas. Self-selected, recruited through community organisations; not a representative sample of Portsmouth. · Qualitative community-based study: one-to-one conversations plus one group event, grouped by topic then thematically analysed. No survey instrument, no percentages, no population estimate. · p.58

Qualifying for social housing required meeting several categories of need at once, and applying online

To access housing, individuals needed to use online platforms and email; the report states there is a lack of appropriate social housing in the city and that families must comply with multiple categories of need to qualify.

18 one-to-one participants living in PO1–PO6 (3 men, 15 women, ages 38–76, 15 with a long-term condition or disability), plus one event with 6 attendees who work with residents of deprived areas. Self-selected, recruited through community organisations; not a representative sample of Portsmouth. · Qualitative community-based study: one-to-one conversations plus one group event, grouped by topic then thematically analysed. No survey instrument, no percentages, no population estimate. · p.58

Condition and suitability, not only supply — private landlords not acting, and a shortage of wheelchair-accessible stock

The report states that landlords do not always take the necessary action to keep privately rented housing in an appropriate state, that shared accommodation affected mental health and wellbeing, and that stock suitable for wheelchair users was not considered adequate.

18 one-to-one participants living in PO1–PO6 (3 men, 15 women, ages 38–76, 15 with a long-term condition or disability), plus one event with 6 attendees who work with residents of deprived areas. Self-selected, recruited through community organisations; not a representative sample of Portsmouth. · Qualitative community-based study: one-to-one conversations plus one group event, grouped by topic then thematically analysed. No survey instrument, no percentages, no population estimate. · p.58

The 16–18 transition from school to college was the weakest point described in education

For older children moving from secondary school to college, the report identifies poor information about local provision, the cost of travelling to college, and — for young people with learning disabilities — safety concerns when attending college only a few hours per week, which in turn constrained parents' ability to work.

18 one-to-one participants living in PO1–PO6 (3 men, 15 women, ages 38–76, 15 with a long-term condition or disability), plus one event with 6 attendees who work with residents of deprived areas. Self-selected, recruited through community organisations; not a representative sample of Portsmouth. · Qualitative community-based study: one-to-one conversations plus one group event, grouped by topic then thematically analysed. No survey instrument, no percentages, no population estimate. · p.58

Named incidental costs — holiday clubs and school trips — were described as decisive for lower-income parents

Financial concerns affected working parents and adults seeking education, specifically the cost of holiday clubs and of school trips; the report recommends considering how lower-income parents might be supported to pay for both.

18 one-to-one participants living in PO1–PO6 (3 men, 15 women, ages 38–76, 15 with a long-term condition or disability), plus one event with 6 attendees who work with residents of deprived areas. Self-selected, recruited through community organisations; not a representative sample of Portsmouth. · Qualitative community-based study: one-to-one conversations plus one group event, grouped by topic then thematically analysed. No survey instrument, no percentages, no population estimate. · p.58

Participants wanted to work; the barriers they named were employer understanding, transport and inflexible roles

The report states that participants believed there is a lack of understanding and indeed discrimination among employers regarding disabilities, that local transport options did not support travel to work, and that despite these challenges people did want to work in ways accessible to them. Gaps in a CV or overseas employment history were also described as barriers.

18 one-to-one participants living in PO1–PO6 (3 men, 15 women, ages 38–76, 15 with a long-term condition or disability), plus one event with 6 attendees who work with residents of deprived areas. Self-selected, recruited through community organisations; not a representative sample of Portsmouth. · Qualitative community-based study: one-to-one conversations plus one group event, grouped by topic then thematically analysed. No survey instrument, no percentages, no population estimate. · p.58

For children with SEND, services were described as disconnected, with families passed between teams

The report identifies a further area beyond its original five: health and education for children with special educational needs or disabilities. Services were described as disconnected, with children passed from one team to another; it calls for joined-up working and a single point of access, and notes inconsistent support between schools and inconsistent application of EHCPs.

18 one-to-one participants living in PO1–PO6 (3 men, 15 women, ages 38–76, 15 with a long-term condition or disability), plus one event with 6 attendees who work with residents of deprived areas. Self-selected, recruited through community organisations; not a representative sample of Portsmouth. · Qualitative community-based study: one-to-one conversations plus one group event, grouped by topic then thematically analysed. No survey instrument, no percentages, no population estimate. · p.59

Portsmouth research

Published research about Portsmouth from the University of Portsmouth and peer-reviewed journals, covering healthcare access, young people's mental health, housing, coastal flood risk and the local energy transition.

This section is research and analysis, not official statistics. It is included to show the range of work that exists on a question — including proposals and hypotheses — not to establish what is true. Items marked as working papers, preprints or institutional reports have not been peer-reviewed. Where an official statistic exists on the same question, that statistic is what this site treats as the fact.

Institutional report — not peer-reviewed2024· University of Portsmouth (Institute of Life Sciences and Healthcare), commissioned by and published by Healthwatch Portsmouth· Portsmouth (PO1–PO6)

The Challenges Facing Portsmouth Residents: A Community-based Research Study

Jennifer Karen Roddis, Nuno Tavares, Elizabeth Anne Roffe

A qualitative study in which 18 residents of PO1–PO6, plus six people who work with residents of deprived areas, described the barriers they meet in healthcare, housing, education, employment and community support — and proposed their own solutions.

Since publication: Two things, both checked on 28 August 2026. First, the deprivation framing in its background section rests on the English Indices of Deprivation 2019, which was superseded by IoD2025 on 30 October 2025 — so the "15 of 115 areas in the lowest decile" line it quotes is out of date and must be re-derived. Second, the same team ran a follow-on project, "Addressing challenges to accessing mental health and dementia support for Portsmouth residents through co-design of patient pathways" (University of Portsmouth with Healthwatch Portsmouth and Bournemouth University, 23 August 2024 to 22 August 2025), whose Portal record was marked finished but listed no published outputs, so the co-designed pathways it produced are not yet citable.

The University of Portsmouth Research Portal record is public, but the Portal's own PDF download is not openly accessible. The PDF link above is the copy in the national Healthwatch reports library, which is the identical 870KB, 62-page document. Findings from this report are shown separately below, each with its sample size attached.

Peer-reviewed2025· University of Portsmouth — Centre for Integrated Health and Wellbeing· United Kingdom — by a Portsmouth research group, but the paper does not state that its eight participants live in Portsmouth, so it is not evidence about this city specifically

The GP's a stranger: an interpretive phenomenological analysis exploring patient experiences of changed access to primary care in the management of long-term conditions

Sandra Walker, Tansy Daniel, Mediha Yildizcan, Jennifer Karen Roddis

Eight people living with long-term physical or mental health conditions described a primary care system in which they no longer have a relationship with any one clinician — the paper's organising theme, "the GP's a stranger" — and the effect that has on whether they trust and act on the advice they are given.

Since publication: Nothing material on the record itself: checked 28 August 2026, the open-access Frontiers article page resolves and carries no correction or retraction, and the Portal lists no successor paper from this team. What has changed is around it — NHS primary care access arrangements have continued to move since the interviews were conducted, so this is evidence about how patients experienced a changing system, not a description of how booking works in Portsmouth today.

Open access (CC BY). Listed here because it is the closest peer-reviewed work by the same Portsmouth group to the primary-care access theme that dominates the Challenges report — not as a Portsmouth measurement.

Peer-reviewed2023· Solent NHS Trust — Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service, Portsmouth· Portsmouth

The viability of a proposed psychoeducational neurodiversity approach in children services: The PANDA (the Portsmouth alliance's neuro-diversity approach)

Zach D. Dunn, Asha Gowda, Isobel C. Horsfall Turner

A feasibility study of the Portsmouth Alliance Neuro-Diversity Approach, a co-produced alternative to a binary diagnostic pathway, in which 51 young people, parents and professionals took part; the authors report a significant improvement in children's wellbeing but not in symptom management, and describe the study as limited in scope.

Since publication: The paper is explicitly a feasibility study and its authors call for further work on the approach; the Crossref record for the DOI, checked 28 August 2026, carries no correction, retraction or update notice. Whether the Portsmouth Alliance still runs the PANDA in the form described is a question for the Alliance, not something that can be inferred from a 2023 feasibility paper.

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 29(1), pp.198–212. The full text is behind the publisher's access controls and was NOT read; title, authors, affiliations, pagination and the complete abstract were verified through Crossref. Nothing is claimed here beyond what that abstract states. Not a University of Portsmouth output — it is a Solent NHS Trust study, included because it is real, in-window and specifically about this city.

Institutional report — not peer-reviewed2024· Coastal Partners (Portsmouth) with Royal HaskoningDHV· Portsmouth

Protecting Portsmouth: The UK's Island City

A. Prior, C. Toovey, L. A. Sheffield, M. L. Bryan

A conference paper on protecting Portsmouth as an island city, presented by the Coastal Partners team responsible for delivering the city's coastal defences and published in the ICE Coasts, Marine Structures and Breakwaters 2023 proceedings.

Since publication: The paper was given at a conference held in 2023 and published in January 2024. Portsmouth's coastal defence programme is delivered in phases and continues to move, so this should be read as the delivery body's account of the programme at that time; Coastal Partners' current published position is the place to check the scheme's present state, not this paper.

METADATA ONLY — the full text was NOT read. The DOI resolves to Emerald's ICE proceedings platform, which is not openly accessible. Title, authors, affiliations, venue and pagination (pp.19–37) were verified through Crossref. It is labelled conservatively as an institutional report because there is no separate "conference paper" category here; the true form is a paper in the ICE Coasts, Marine Structures and Breakwaters 2023 proceedings. The summary above deliberately claims nothing about its findings.

Institutional report — not peer-reviewed2021· University of Portsmouth — School of Civil Engineering & Surveying· Portsmouth Harbour

Field investigation and numerical modelling of drainage systems in coastal regions

Steve Mitchell, Oluwatosin Abdulfatai Onabule

Using field data from Portsmouth Harbour with a numerical model, the authors show how land drainage outlets carve and maintain channels through the harbour's intertidal mudflats and export sediment and water into it — and that flap gates increase that export sharply on spring tides and under high freshwater flows.

Since publication: Nothing material found on the record: the Portal entry, checked 28 August 2026, shows no later version or corrigendum. Two caveats matter more than that. It sits at the very edge of the five-year empirical window and will need a staleness flag from 2027. And its Portsmouth Harbour field campaign predates the later phases of the city's coastal defence works, so its measurements describe the harbour as it was observed, not necessarily as it now drains.

Conditions have moved on — Published 2021, at the outer edge of the five-year empirical window and outside it from 2027. The field campaign predates the coastal defence works completed in Portsmouth since, so its measured drainage behaviour describes the system as it was, not as built today. Use the method and the modelling approach; do not read its measurements as current conditions.

Published in "Towards a Sustainable Water Future" (ICE Publishing), pp.371–382. `status` is recorded conservatively as institutional_report because the Portal classifies it "Conference contribution" WITHOUT a peer-review tag, and ResearchStatus has no "conference paper" member. Abstract read in full from the Portal record.

Institutional report — not peer-reviewed2017· Project Compass CIC, with the University of Portsmouth research record· Portsmouth — Southsea frontage and Common

Portsmouth the island city: building better flood resilience for Southsea's frontage + common: for a more sustainable Portsmouth

Walter Menteth

A 44-page report from the international Portsmouth Elephant Cage design research programme (2016–17), which evaluated the sea defence proposals then on the table for the Southsea frontage, set out an alternative design intended to add amenity and ecological value to Southsea Common, and recommended actions to address what it argued were shortfalls in the existing proposals.

Since publication: This is a 2017 critique of the sea defence proposals as they stood in 2017. The scheme has moved on since, so nothing in it should be read as a description of what is currently proposed or built along the Southsea frontage — check Coastal Partners' current published scheme for that. What remains usable is the argument about how design options for a coastal city get narrowed early, which is a mechanism claim rather than a dated fact.

ISBN 978-0-9931481-3-2, published in London by Project Compass CIC; the Portal marks it externally published. Portal record and full abstract read; the 24.9MB PDF sits on the Portal's Cloudflare-protected /files/ tree and was not retrieved.

Peer-reviewed2018· Walter Menteth Architects / Project Compass CIC, with the University of Portsmouth research record· Portsmouth (Southsea) and Cork, Ireland

Coastal flood resilience: delivering thriving waterfront cities

Walter Menteth

Argues that resilient design for coastal cities is constrained less by engineering than by process — narrow remits, bureaucratic momentum and the inability to iterate publicly — using Portsmouth's Southsea frontage proposals and the comparable situation in Cork as its two cases.

Since publication: The Southsea and Cork proposals it compares were live proposals at the time of writing and both cities' schemes have since progressed, so the chapter is no longer a description of either scheme. Its value now is the process argument, which is why it is filed as a mechanism rather than an empirical source.

Chapter 10, pp.80–85, of "The Cork Papers: Sustainable City in the Making" (ed. Angela Brady), Cork City Council, CC BY-NC. This is the only chapter or proceedings item in this module that the Portal explicitly tags "Chapter (peer-reviewed) › peer-review", which is why it alone carries peer_reviewed status.

Thesis2016· University of Portsmouth — School of Civil Engineering & Surveying· Portsmouth — Hilsea, Eastney and St Thomas wards

Portsmouth Coastal Flood Vulnerability and Risk: assessment and mapping of impacts at microscale

Sarah Percival

Develops a coastal flood vulnerability and risk method that works at Output Area level and distinguishes daytime from night-time exposure, and applies it to three Portsmouth wards — Hilsea, Eastney and St Thomas — finding that the extra resolution identifies neighbourhoods a coarser assessment misses.

Since publication: Its population inputs are the 2011 Census, which the 2021 Census has replaced, and its defence assumptions predate the current Portsmouth coastal defence programme. The specific ward and neighbourhood risk rankings should therefore not be quoted as current risk for anywhere in the city; what survives is the microscale, day/night method and the general point that ward-level averages hide the neighbourhoods that matter.

Conditions have moved on — Population and household inputs are 2011 Census, superseded by the 2021 Census; hazard assumptions predate the current coastal defence programme. Use the METHOD, not the 2016 risk maps or the named at-risk neighbourhoods.

Doctoral thesis, awarded June 2016, supervised by Richard Teeuw and Andy Gale. Portal record and full abstract read; the 25.6MB thesis PDF sits on the Portal's Cloudflare-protected /files/ tree and was not retrieved. Categorised as `mechanism` because what this module would use is its method — the empirical risk maps inside it are older than the empirical window and the staleness flag above says so explicitly.

Institutional report — not peer-reviewed2025· University of Portsmouth — School of Energy and Electronic Engineering, with University of Chichester and University of Wollongong in Dubai· Portsmouth

Seasonal dynamics of green hydrogen supply and demand: a spatio temporal study of freight transport in Portsmouth City UK

Oghenovo Okpako, Imran Usman Sumda, Kelvin Anoh, Haile Selassie Rajamani

A 2050 scenario study which sites offshore wind and hydrogen production for Portsmouth using GIS, simulates seasonal supply against the city's road-freight demand, finds a seasonal mismatch between the two, and proposes a dynamic pricing model to shift consumption into surplus periods.

Since publication: Nothing material found: the Portal record, checked 28 August 2026, lists no later version and the DOI resolves. The far more important caveat is what the paper is — a modelled 2050 scenario built on assumed offshore wind resource and assumed freight demand, whose pricing proposal is an output of the model. It is not an observed Portsmouth hydrogen price and must never be rendered as one.

IEEE SEGE 2025 proceedings, pp.275–281. Abstract read in full from the Portal record; the IEEE Xplore full text is paywalled. It is labelled conservatively as an institutional report because the Portal classifies it "Conference contribution" without a peer-review tag. Filed under energy cost modelling deliberately — it proposes a pricing model, so it is exactly the category the pre-2022 hard cutoff exists for, and at 2025 it clears that cutoff.

All figures for Portsmouth

Every comparable measure held for the 13 areas, with its own period and comparator. Survey estimates and measures with mixed periods are not ranked.

MeasurePortsmouthEngland / GBHampshire rangePeriodStatus and source
Claimant rate4.5%4.0% (England, August 2026)1.8% (Hart) – 4.5% (Portsmouth)August 2026Official statistic · ONS Claimant Count via Nomis (NM_162_1, measure 2)
Employment rate77.8%75.5% (GB, Apr 2025-Mar 2026)73.3% (Southampton) – 87.6% (Fareham)Apr 2025-Mar 2026Survey estimate · ONS Annual Population Survey via Nomis
Median full-time earnings (residents)£36,457£40,014 (England, 2025)£36,457 (Portsmouth) – £48,256 (Hart)2025Official statistic · ONS Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, resident analysis, via Nomis
House price to earnings ratio7.1×7.4× (England, House price: year ending Mar 2026. Earnings: 2025.)6.8× (Gosport) – 10.5× (Winchester)Year ending Mar 2026 house price / 2025 earningsSite calculation · ONS median house prices for administrative geographies (HPSSA)
Median house price£260,000£295,000 (England, Year ending Mar 2026)£252,000 (Gosport) – £467,500 (Winchester)Year ending Mar 2026Official statistic · ONS median house prices for administrative geographies (HPSSA)
Persistent absence19.7%18.1% (England, 2024/25)12.7% (Hart) – 21.5% (Southampton)2024/25Official statistic · DfE, Pupil absence in schools in England 2024/25
Male life expectancy at birth78.1 yrs79.5 yrs (England, 2022 to 2024)78.0 yrs (Southampton) – 83.7 yrs (Hart)2022 to 2024Official statistic · ONS, Life expectancy for local areas of the UK: between 2001 to 2003 and 2022 to 2024
Female life expectancy at birth82.6 yrs83.3 yrs (England, 2022 to 2024)82.3 yrs (Gosport) – 86.3 yrs (Winchester)2022 to 2024Official statistic · ONS, Life expectancy for local areas of the UK: between 2001 to 2003 and 2022 to 2024
Neighbourhoods in England’s most deprived 10%12.0%10.0% (England, 2025)0.0% (Winchester) – 12.0% (Portsmouth)2025Official statistic · MHCLG, English Indices of Deprivation 2025
Police-recorded crime rate112.583.4 (England, year ending March 2026)37.1 (Hart) – 118.8 (Southampton)September 2025 to August 2026Administrative data · police.uk open data, street-level crimes (Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary)
Sources and methods (12)

Method notes

  • Each local page’s headline is chosen by a site rule, not written by hand: among measures with a matched England comparator and one period for all 13 areas, the selector scores |distance from the Hampshire median| + 0.5 × |distance from England|, both in cross-area standard deviations, and takes the highest. Survey estimates (employment rate), measures with mixed periods, and crime (its England comparator is a different source) cannot lead. Below a score of 0.75 the page uses a neutral fallback.
  • County figures are never invented. Rates are shown as ranges across the 13 areas, with the lowest and highest named, because a pooled employment rate needs each area’s employed and 16–64 population counts and a pooled absence rate needs pupil enrolments — this site holds neither. Population is a genuine sum.
  • England comparators: claimant count, absence, life expectancy and deprivation share the local period. So does the house-price-to-earnings ratio. Crime is compared with England’s ONS rate for the year to March 2026, a different source, which is flagged beside the figure. The employment comparator is Great Britain because Nomis publishes no England figure in that series.
  • Ranks are given only for administrative measures with one period. Survey estimates show no rank.
  • Winchester figures cover Winchester district, not just the city.
  • Crime (September 2025 to August 2026): every crime police.uk published for the 13 areas, fetched month by month from the police.uk API for a polygon around each council area, de-duplicated and assigned to the area its anonymised map point falls in (unsimplified ONS boundaries; 17 points on the coast that fell between boundary lines went to the nearest area within 1 km). Anti-social behaviour and British Transport Police records are kept out of crime totals. Rates use ONS mid-2025 resident populations. The method and script are in scripts/police-uk/; a check against the site’s separately built police.uk archive series for Portsmouth and Southampton (assigned by neighbourhood code, not by map point) agrees to within one crime a month.
  • Crime is checked against the ONS official figures (police force area and Community Safety Partnership tables, year ending March 2026). Over the same 12 months (April 2025 to March 2026), police.uk shows 135,156 crimes in the 13 areas against 137,696 in the ONS tables (−1.8%). Area by area the two are within 3.4% of each other; police.uk is lower in most areas and slightly higher in a few. For the whole force, including the Isle of Wight, police.uk is 4.1% below ONS, mostly because ONS also counts 3,316 offences it could not place in any area.
  • Crime is not used to lead a page: the comparator for England is a different source, and resident-based rates overstate risk where many non-residents visit. Areas are ranked only with that caveat beside the rank.